Team 101

NCAA 2017: Michigan vs. Louisville Preview

Michigan finally gets its National Championship rematch on Sunday afternoon in the NCAA Tournament second round.

Basics
Who: No. 7 Michigan (25-11, 10-8 B1G) vs. No. 2 Louisville (24-8, 12-6 B12)
Where: Bankers Life Field House (Indianapolis, IN)
When: 12:10 p.m., Sunday, March 19th, 2017
TV: CBS

Michigan finally gets its National Championship rematch on Sunday afternoon in the NCAA Tournament second round. The Wolverines will try to make up for that 2013 National Championship defeat and get back to the Sweet 16 for the first time since 2014.

They’ll be facing a Louisville team that was ranked as high as 4th nationally this season and finished tied for 2nd in the ACC at 12-6. The Cardinals have plenty of quality wins (Wichita State, Purdue, Kentucky, Duke), but also entered the NCAA Tournament having lost three of their last 5 including a shootout loss at Wake Forest.

The Cardinals have the nation’s 7th best defense according the KenPom’s adjusted efficiency numbers and outscored ACC opponents 1.13 points per possession to 1 point per possession in league games.

The Cardinals

On paper, Louisville’s statistical resume appears to match the stereotype of a Rick Pitino coached team. The Cardinals check all of boxes with a top-ten defense and a very good, but not great offense. They are great on the offensive glass to compensate for having a fairly average shooting team overall. The defense features great shot blocking, interior defense and a mix of pressing, trapping and match-up zone.

Defensively, Louisville fouls a lot. The Cardinals allowed more free throws than anyone else in the ACC and ranked 258th nationally in FTA/FGA. That aggression generally pays off as the Cardinals are ranked 22nd in 2-point defense, 28th in 3-point defense and 17th in eFG% defense with the 6th best block rate in the country. They force turnovers on 19.8% of their opponents’ possessions (90th) and are also solid if unspectacular on the defensive glass, grabbing 71.5% of their opponents’ misses.

Like any Pitino-coached team, the Cardinals will mix up their defenses. Louisville runs zone on 23.5% of its offensive possessions and presses on 23.6% — its ranked in the 98th percentile in man-to-man defense, 68th percentile in zone defense and 78th percentile in press defense, per Synergy.

Louisville’s ball screen defense grades out in the 54th percentile. The Cardinals have shown problems covering the roll man, grading out in the 89th percentile defending ball handler’s offense and 14th percentile defending the roll man’s offense. The defensive statistic that pops off the page when reviewing Louisville is how many off the dribble jumpers the Cardinals force. 20.2% of Louisville’s defensive possessions end with an off the dribble jump shot (31st) and teams have an eFG% of just 32.5% on those attempts (10th best in Division I).

Offensively, Louisville values the basketball and crashes the glass. The Cardinals turn it over on just 15.9% of their offensive possessions (27th) and rebound 36.6% of their missed shots (13th). That offensive rebounding ability has allowed Louisville to have the No. 23 offense in the country according to KenPom despite mediocre shooting numbers. They shoot just 50.3% on twos (129th) and 35.8% on threes (130th) for a 51.4 eFG% (132).

Louisville is a heavy ball screen team, with 25.6% of its possessions ending out of pick and roll action, and grades out in the 75th percentile in efficiency. Despite the big frontcourt, only 10.6% of the Cardinals’ possessions end out of post ups. That’s an option that’s available, but doesn’t appear to be near the top of the list (10% of possessions). The Cardinals play 16% of their offensive possessions in transition, but grade out in just the 20th percentile in transition efficiency — a sign that they might be overaggressive in forcing the issue.

Personnel

6-foot-3 sophomore Donovan Mitchell and 6-foot-2 junior Quentin Snider handle the majority of backcourt playmaking duties. They both play heavy minutes and lead the team in three-point makes and assists. Both attempt roughly half of their shots from three-point range and can hit the perimeter jumper at a consistent clip. Snider plays the point and leads the team in assists, he’s also shooting 40% on twos and 39% on threes. Mitchell isn’t far off, shooting 46% on twos and 39% on threes.

They aren’t as effective inside the arc but, as we saw against Oklahoma State, the ability to get shots up on the rim can be enough with a great offensive rebounding team. Mitchell grades out in the 81st percentile using ball screens (including passes) and Snider grades out in the 67th. The duo should be a natural match-up for Michigan’s guards on both ends of the floor.

6-foot-7, 200 pound Deng Adel touts a 6’9.5″ wingspan an starts at the three for the Cardinals. Adel shoots 34% from three-point range, where he attempts 38% of his field goal attempts. The Australian wing gets most of his offense in spot up situations (32% of possessions) and in transition (22% of possessions), but he’ll also run the occasional ball screen but grades out in just the 37th percentile.

Inside is where the scouting report gets dicey for Michigan. The Cardinals have four players at 6-foot-9 or taller that split the minutes at the four and five — Ray SpaldingJaylen JohnsonMangok Mathiang and Anas Mahmoud — and they all appear to be matchup concerns for the Wolverines.

Together, it’s probably the longest and most athletic frontcourt that Michigan has faced this season. All four players are nationally ranked in block rate and offensive rebounding rate and they all shoot at least 52% on two-point attempts. Johnson and Mathiang are the best offensive rebounders of the bunch while Mahmoud is ranked 4th nationally in block rate.

As you can see from their shot charts, they aren’t the most diverse offensive players. Almost all of their production comes around the rim and they aren’t going to stretch you out with their shooting ability. Mathiang and Johnson are  the best post up scorer of the bunch, but the Louisville offense doesn’t generally run through the post as often as Michigan has seen against teams like Purdue or Wisconsin.

While the Cardinals have great depth in the frontcourt, they don’t have as much in the backcourt. 6-foot-6 freshman VJ King is the only wing or guard who plays consistent minutes off the bench. King can hit the open three (42%) and has pro potential with his 6-foot-6, 190 pound frame, but he’s played a fairly limited role in the Cardinal offense.

Keys

  • Execute the offense: Louisville wants to turn teams over and force them out of their offense. Expect to see an array of different pressures and presses just to burn time off the shot clock and force Michigan out of its comfort zone. The famous match-ups between Beilein and Pitino in the past were usually shootouts, so the Beilein offense has proven capable of scoring against the looks they’ll see from Louisville. If Michigan can adjust and run its action, it should have the offensive ability to stay in this game.
  • Defensive rebounding: Michigan just won a NCAA Tournament game despite allowing Oklahoma State to rebound half of its misses, but it’ll be hard to repeat that and beat Louisville. The Cardinals are only a couple of spots behind Oklahoma State in the offensive rebounding leaderboards and that is cause for concern for the Wolverines. Louisville has the depth to wear down Michigan in the front court and that would only add to the pressure on Wilson, Wagner and company.
  • Derrick Walton: Walton has been playing at a ridiculous level for the last month and he’s going to need to continue to do that if Michigan wants to play on. The Cardinals force as many tough off the dribble jumpers as anyone else in the country and Walton has been hitting those. If he stops hitting them, Michigan’s season is over. If he keeps on rolling, the Wolverines have a chance to play on.

Bottom Line

KenPom likes Louisville by a final score of 70-68, but gives Michigan a 42% chance at the upset. Las Vegas agrees as the current point spread is Louisville by 2.5 points.

Comments
To Top