Michigan played defense in 2017-18.
John Beilein has been coaching for four decades, but the Wolverines managed to break seemingly every stereotype that has followed him throughout his career.
Michigan won five NCAA Tournament games despite playing only one great offensive game. The famous NCAA Tournament teams of Beilein’s past are remembered for their offensive shootouts in the NCAA Tournament. His latest team made it to the season’s final day with a collection of rock fights.
Just how good was Michigan defensively in 2017-18? What made the Wolverines so effective? This is part four of our five-part dissection of the Wolverine defense in 2017-18, examining what made it so effective and what could be in store for the future.
Cleaning the Glass examined Michigan’s defense during the NCAA Tournament in a piece titled “Doing it Better”. The primary takeaway was that the Wolverines are a better defense not because of scheme or strategy but by better execution.
How have they done it? Perhaps you’d expect that the Wolverines changed some core part of their schemes, say, altering how they guarded pick-and-rolls or stopping crashing the boards in order to emphasize transition defense. Except that’s not the case. Michigan’s surprising improvement comes not from overhauling their strategy but from a focus on execution. And it started with a coaching hire.
Everything outlined in that post is true. Michigan’s strategy was solid, but many parts of the plan were unchanged from previous seasons. They were just working far better.