Dylan and Brendan run through the Big Ten to discuss where each team in the league stands relative to the NCAA Tournament. What type of seeds can top-half teams expect? What do bottom-half teams have to do make the field? Who are we buying and selling?
Listen to “Bracket Bluster: A look at every Big Ten team's NCAA Tournament hopes” on Spreaker.
Special Offer!
Timestamps:
(0:00): Big Ten thoughts on Michigan State, Michigan, Purdue, Indiana, Northwestern and Iowa
(44:00): Rick Boyages on Big Ten officiating
The podcast is available just about everywhere that you can listen to podcasts.

Notable Replies
Discuss the Article
3 more replies
JBmoney
I think Michigan’s best path forward comes from 4 or more specifically TWill. I think the backcourt has been okay for being young players so I’m not sure how much more growth we are going to get by the end of the year
TWill has been underwhelming but has shown in the past he has games where he can bang 3 or 4 threes. On almost the same number of attempts he is 27% this year vs. 38.5 last year. If you figure him in the middle to get to 32/33 percent, he probably needs to go 40+ the rest of the way.
I do think he is overexposed in his role but if he can go on a hot streak here (not unprecedented for him) then that can open up Hunter more. I think no matter what the backcourt does, if teams are going to use the PSU strategy then TWill has to shoot them out of it.
AC1997
I think other opportunities for Michigan to go on a hot streak (all of which do feel unlikely):
Unfortunately, I can’t say that I’m optimistic for those things - but anything is possible in a conference where everyone is basically a flawed .500 team except Purdue.
Apex_Rogers
I’m about to listen to this. Just want to mention a minor nitpick on the posting: It mentions the timestamps from the B1G Ref episode a while back, which I’m pretty sure only apply to that one episode:
umhoops
Oops, sorry about that. Forgot that was at the bottom of the post.
kejamder
Re: bids by conference & where the top teams land - Brendan seems surprised by the thought of nine B1G teams with a single 1 and a bunch of 4+ teams - as opposed to two 1 seeds in the SEC with little else, but if we’ve learned anything from football, it’s very normal to see this, and people will overvalue the SEC given the two 1 seeds (regardless of how poor the rest of the conference is).
The B1G and Big12 have similar “problem” in a bunch of decent teams beating each other up. The shocking thing would be to see Purdue maintain a 1 through a gauntlet of B1G tourney-team away games.