Podcast

Podcast: What we learned from Michigan’s first loss and what it means moving forward

Michigan lost its first game of the year on Saturday in a 91-88 home loss to Wisconsin. Dylan and Eric break down what happened, Michigan’s defensive strategy, adjustments, and what went wrong. Then, they try to sort out what to make of Michigan’s recent downturn in form and what it means moving forward as the Big Ten race heats up.

The UM Hoops Podcast · Episode 232 · 1:17:48

Michigan's first loss of the season
0:001:17:48

Show notes

Michigan lost its first game of the season, 91-88 to Wisconsin, after the Badgers made 15 threes, including seven in a row to open the second half. Dylan Burkhardt and Eric Shapiro walk through the drop coverage on pick-and-pops, the switch to 1 through 5 switching, and why the execution fell apart.

They also cover Michigan's offense, with only nine transition possessions, the 2-foul bench decision on Elliot Cadeau, and how worried to be about recent 3-point shooting. They close with the Big Ten race, the Washington and Oregon trip, upcoming five-out opponents and Yaxel Lendeborg's health.

  • wisconsin loss
  • 3-point shooting
  • drop coverage
  • switching defense
  • transition offense
  • big ten race
  • rotation
  • injuries

Worth hearing

  • 16:13 · Switching 1 through 5 and the breakdowns

    “I thought their 1 through 5 switching was the worst that it’s looked in any game this year, and in part because of miscommunicating switches and then also just not being able to stay in front of the ball.”

    Eric Shapiro

    Share
  • 46:09 · How worried to be about 3-point shooting

    “Shooting, like making shots, it’s just like an accelerant. And when you make shots, you’re never like— it makes you feel so much better than you are.”

    Dylan Burkhardt

    Share
  • 1:13:43 · Preparing for five-out opponents

    “I think Michigan expected that when it went switch 1 through 5, it would be dominant. And I think everything that had happened this year had pointed to that being an elite option.”

    Dylan Burkhardt

    Share
  • 4:26 · Michigan's first loss of the season

    “Wisconsin had the formula and they made a ton of shots in the second half, probably an unsustainable or what you wouldn’t have thought on paper, like, quantity.”

    Eric Shapiro

    Share
  • 47:43 · How worried to be about 3-point shooting

    “I’m definitely less concerned than that. I wasn’t really thinking in terms of numbers, but like one of the most variable things game to game is 3-point shooting.”

    Eric Shapiro

    Share
  • Prediction1:05:53 · Preparing for five-out opponents

    “Kepnang is like a post anchor. He’s the perfect guy for Michigan to scheme against because you can just put Mara down there and switch everything else out.”

    Dylan Burkhardt

    Share

Chapters

  1. Michigan's first loss of the season
  2. Wisconsin's 3-point shooting by the numbers
  3. Drop coverage and the pick-and-pop
  4. Switching 1 through 5 and the breakdowns
  5. Luck, credit and Michigan's mistakes
  6. Michigan's offense and missing transition
  7. The Cadeau two-foul bench decision
  8. How worried to be about 3-point shooting
  9. The 2-point gap and the late fouls
  10. Big Ten race and West Coast reset
  11. Preparing for five-out opponents
  12. Yaxel Lendeborg needs to get going

UM Hoops+

Upgrade to UM Hoops+

The Extra Pass every Thursday, Game Day Live, every press conference quote from Michigan at Washington in the complete Locker Room, the Data Hub and Film Room.

$10/mo or $100/yr

Join UM Hoops+

Already a member? Compare plans

Free from UM Hoops

Game-day previews in your inbox

The podcast, the preview and what to watch for before every Michigan game, from UM Hoops. Free.

Join the conversation · 25 replies on the forum

The conversation

25 repliesJoin the discussion
  1. Royalman10

    For some reason this podcast really makes me wanna fly spirit

    Reply
  2. harris116

    Great pod! Excited to see how the team comes out in Washington. Hoping the pressure of perfection being removed (and maybe a little less national narratives) will help the team just get back to progressively getting better. If you had given me 14-1 at the beginning of the season, would have been ecstatic. Everything still in front of them and they have the pieces to legitimately compete with every team. Definitely hoping to see a more aggressive form of Yax (offensively, defensively, and on the boards).

    Reply
  3. urbanachiever

    Great pod. I’ll cast my vote as someone that loves Xs and Os pods especially after losses.

    Will be fascinating to see how Michigan wants to defend against teams with shooting bigs going forward, especially Nebraska and Illinois.

    Reply
  4. umhoops

    I do think there’s a big part of those games that is different in that they have shooting bigs who are actually going to go on the scouting report as shooters.

    This was a guy you didn’t expect to make shots making a lot of shots.

    That’s why it was so impactful in changing the game. Similar to the few games last year where Goldin randomly hit a few threes. Just completely found money.

    Reply
  5. urbanachiever

    Yeah but I also think it was an obvious place to try to attack Michigan’s defense, because you want to force Mara out of the paint.

    Maybe not a high probability outcome for Wisconsin, but how else were they going to attack Michigan’s base defense.

    I thought your take on Morez was interesting, regarding basically inviting teams to try and game plan around attacking him 1-on-1 on the perimeter. I’m definitely not down on his game out there, but a little less certain about his switchability onto elite guards

    Reply
To Top